From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loadholt v. San Diego Trading Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2022
22-CV-8118 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-8118 (VEC)

11-15-2022

CHRISTOPHER LOADHOLT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO TRADING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge:

WHEREAS on September 22, 2022, Plaintiff sued San Diego Trading Company, Inc., alleging that Plaintiff was “denied full and equal access to” Defendant's website in violation of the Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”) and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), see Dkt. 1;

WHEREAS on October 21, 2022, Defendant appeared and filed a Motion to Dismiss, see Dkts. 6-9; and

WHEREAS on November 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, see Dkt. 11.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motion at docket entry 8.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint is December 2, 2023.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Loadholt v. San Diego Trading Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2022
22-CV-8118 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Loadholt v. San Diego Trading Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LOADHOLT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

22-CV-8118 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2022)