From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lloyd v. Hutchinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 25, 2020
No. 20-6670 (4th Cir. Sep. 25, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6670

09-25-2020

JAMES MARCUS LLOYD, III, Petitioner - Appellant, v. J. HUTCHINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

James Marcus Lloyd, III, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge. (0:20-cv-00963-MGL) Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Marcus Lloyd, III, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Marcus Lloyd, III, seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's report and recommendation recommending that Lloyd's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition be dismissed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The report and recommendation Lloyd seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Lloyd's motions to appoint counsel and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Lloyd v. Hutchinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 25, 2020
No. 20-6670 (4th Cir. Sep. 25, 2020)
Case details for

Lloyd v. Hutchinson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MARCUS LLOYD, III, Petitioner - Appellant, v. J. HUTCHINSON, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 25, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6670 (4th Cir. Sep. 25, 2020)