From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lleshanaku v. Kenmore Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 2003
309 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1761N, 1761NA

October 7, 2003.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered June 5, 2003 and June 9, 2003, which, sua sponte, struck the action from the trial calendar and transferred it to Civil Court pursuant to CPLR 325(d), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Pro Se Rabie Lleshanaku, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Michael A. Valentine, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.


Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in removing plaintiff's action, seeking damages for, inter alia, violations of the Roommate Law (Real Property Law § 235-f), to Civil Court since plaintiff's claims for equitable relief had been rendered moot, and since Civil Court would have had jurisdiction of the matter but for the amount of damages demanded by plaintiffs, which amount, it was apparent after a hearing, plaintiffs were largely unprepared to substantiate ( see CPLR 325[d]; see e.g. Chico v. Nadler, 300 A.D.2d 105; cf. Gair Co. v. Cambridge Carpet, Ltd., 160 A.D.2d 371).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Lleshanaku v. Kenmore Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 2003
309 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Lleshanaku v. Kenmore Assoc

Case Details

Full title:EDUARD LLESHANAKU, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KENMORE ASSOCIATES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 502

Citing Cases

Mazza v. Seneca

Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, even the lesser sanction of preclusion would not have been…