From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Llamas v. Harris Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jan 23, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1029 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1029

01-23-2020

RICARDO LLAMAS, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, and DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER MOOK, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND OVERRULING OBJECTIONS

This court referred this case to Judge Bryan for report and recommendation, which Judge Bryan entered on November 22, 2019. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Her memorandum recommended granting the motions to dismiss the claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force and malicious prosecution or wrongful detention against Harris County, Texas, and Christopher Mook, a Harris County Deputy Sheriff. (Docket Entry No. 16). This court's review leads the court to adopt the recommendation to grant the defendants' motions to dismiss as this court's ruling.

The case arises from Deputy Mook's use of a firearm on March 26, 2017, while the plaintiff, Ricardo Llamas, was driving. As a result of the March 26, 2017, incident, Llamas was charged with felony aggravated assault of a public servant and convicted of misdemeanor deadly conduct.

The section 1983 claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). The malicious prosecution and wrongful detention claims are also barred by Castellano v. Fragozo, 352 F.3d 939, 945 (5th Cir. 2003), and the claims against Harris County are barred by Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978). Finally, qualified immunity applies to the claims against Deputy Mook.

The court overrules the objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Even with de novo review, the court finds that the objections are primarily based on allegations relating to unrelated incidents involving the Harris County Sheriff's Office. These allegations do not present a basis to overcome the bars to the causes of action Llamas asserts.

The motions to dismiss, (Docket Entry Nos. 12, 13), are granted, with prejudice, because amendment would be futile. An order of dismissal with prejudice is separately entered.

SIGNED on January 23, 2020, at Houston, Texas.

/s/_________

Lee H. Rosenthal

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Llamas v. Harris Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jan 23, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1029 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Llamas v. Harris Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO LLAMAS, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, and DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-1029 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2020)

Citing Cases

Rubin v. De La Cruz

See Llamas v. Harris County, Tex., No. 4:19-CV-1029, 2019 WL 7708605, at *5 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2019),…

Jefferson v. Gonzalez

The mere listing of these incidents without more does not allege an unconstitutional county custom, practice…