From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lixfield v. Cornwell Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1984
105 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 5, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Burchell, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

Although plaintiff is appealing from an order of Special Term entered September 2, 1983, which denied her motion for summary judgment against defendants Barash and Conservo, in the sum of $30,871, for unpaid taxes, based on breach of contract, she is in reality challenging a prior order of Special Term dated April 9, 1980, which struck "[t]hat portion of the demand for relief contained in the amended complaint which seeks judgment against the defendants Barash and Conservo other than a deficiency judgment pursuant to RPAPL § 1371 Acts.", an order from which she never appealed. Plaintiff was required to serve a notice of appeal within 30 days after service upon her of a copy of the order dated April 9, 1980 and written notice of its entry, if she wished to contest the determination contained in that order (CPLR 5513, subd [a]). Gibbons, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lixfield v. Cornwell Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1984
105 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Lixfield v. Cornwell Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY D. LIXFIELD, Appellant, v. CORNWELL DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

McMurray v. Mosca

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.). Ordered that the order is affirmed, with…

Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Strong

To the extent that an aggrieved party takes issue with either the judgment of foreclosure and sale or any…