February 24, 1983
Motion for reargument denied for the reason that it fails to state any points claimed to have been overlooked or misapprehended by this court ( 22 NYCRR 600.14 [a]), with $20 costs.
Concur — Silverman, J.P., Bloom, Fein and Alexander, JJ.
Full title:FRANK J. LIVOTI et al. v. MARY J.F. MALLON
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Feb 24, 1983
Under Section 600.14(a), motions for reargument are limited to points that "have been overlooked or…
In re City of N.Y. v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Assoc.I. The City of New York's fatally late and fatally flawed new evidence and new theories of the case are not…