From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Livingston v. W.C.A.B. et al

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 19, 1982
447 A.2d 715 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1982)

Summary

In Livingston, moreover, a mailgram was received by the Claimant who refused the employment, yet we held that there was nothing in the record to prove that the job was available at any time other than the date on which it was received by Claimant, a considerable time prior to the hearings on which the referee's decision was based.

Summary of this case from King Fifth Wheel v. W.C.A.B

Opinion

July 19, 1982.

Workmen's compensation — Partial disability — Burden of proof — Availability of work — Time of availability.

1. An employer seeking to change the status of a workmen's compensation claimant from one of total disability to partial disability must prove not only the diminishment of disability but the availability of work within the employe's capabilities at the time of the partial disability, and proof of the availability of such work some time prior to the time when the employe was found to be only partially disabled is insufficient to sustain that burden. [498]

Submitted on briefs May 6, 1982, to Judges BLATT, WILLIAMS, JR. and MacPHAIL, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 115 C.D. 1981, from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of Vernon E. Livingston v. Upper Yoder Township.

Petition to the Department of Labor and Industry to terminate total disability payments. Partial disability benefits awarded. Employe appealed to the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board. Award affirmed. Employe appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Reversed. Reinstatement of compensation with interest and attorney fees ordered. Application for reargument filed and denied.

James R. DiFrancesco, for petitioner.

Edward G. Kuyat, Jr., for respondents.


In this appeal by the Claimant from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) awarding partial disability benefits only, the issue is whether the Employer met its burden of proving the availability of suitable work within the Claimant's physical capabilities. The referee found as a fact that the Employer had met its burden and his decision was affirmed by the Board.

Vernon E. Livingston.

Upper Yoder Township.

None of the underlying facts in this case are in dispute. On May 16, 1977, Claimant suffered a compensable injury as a result of which a Notice of Compensation Payable was executed by Employer's insurance carrier awarding total disability payments to Claimant. Those payments continued until the effective date of an automatic supersedeas entered pursuant to a physician's affidavit of full recovery executed January 28, 1980.

At the hearing on Employer's petition to terminate, the Employer offered medical testimony by way of deposition which fully supports the referee's finding of partial disability. Unless the Employer proves also that there is available work within the Claimant's physical limitations, however, the medical evidence of partial as opposed to total disability in and of itself is insufficient to reduce the award. State Products Corporation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 61 Pa. Commw. 366, 434 A.2d 207 (1981). In the instant case, the only evidence of available work was a mailgram from Vocational Rehabilitation Services, Inc. which Claimant admitted receiving in July, 1979, which stated that a school bus driving job was available at that time. The Claimant refused that job because he felt he was physically incapable of handling it. The physician who examined the Claimant for the Employer in January, 1980, testified by way of deposition on April 1, 1980, that in his opinion, such a job would be within Claimant's physical capabilities. All of the physician's relevant testimony was as to facts in praesenti and not at some prior point in time. Neither at the referee's hearing of February 27, 1980, nor at the continued hearing held August 13, 1980, did the Employer offer any evidence that the school bus job was available at that time; nevertheless, the referee found that

A. . . . So I think that Mr. Livingston could perform some light duty type of work activity. . . . (N.T. 15).

Q. Do you have an opinion as to whether or not he could perform light duty over an eight hour period?

A. It would depend upon again the type of work activity. . . . (N.T. 16).

Q. And, I take it at this time from your testimony that your opinion is that Mr. Livingston is suffering from at least a partial disability at this time?

A. That is correct. (N.T. 19) (Emphasis added.)

8. Work is available to the claimant that he could perform within the limitations of his disability operating a school bus for the McIllwain Bus Lines, 1559 Ferndale Avenue, Johnstown, PA. which job would pay wages at the rate of $85 per week which would result in loss of earnings of $96.60. (Emphasis added.)

We repeat, there is nothing in the record that would show that the bus driving job was available at any time other than in July of 1979.

It is our view that in order to meet his burden, Employer must show that suitable work is available at the time the Claimant is found to be partially disabled. As this Court said in Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Universal Cyclops, 20 Pa. Commw. 261, 265, 341 A.2d 223, 225 (1975)

The Employer need not prove an actual job offer, only that jobs within a claimant's physical capacity and qualifications are available within the relevant labor market. (Emphasis added.)

Where an employer's only evidence of suitable work consists of something which was available six months prior to a physical examination which showed Claimant to be partially rather than totally disabled, and seven to twelve months prior to the referee's hearings, we must conclude that the Employer has failed to meet its burden of showing that suitable work is available within the relevant labor market.

Because the referee's critical finding that work is available to the Claimant is not supported by substantial evidence, we must reverse.

ORDER

The order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board dated April 16, 1981, is reversed. The Notice of Compensation Payable is reinstated. Deferred payments of compensation shall bear interest at the statutory rate. Counsel fees in the amount of $105.00 are approved for payment to James R. DiFrancesco, Esquire, Johnstown, Pa.


Summaries of

Livingston v. W.C.A.B. et al

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 19, 1982
447 A.2d 715 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1982)

In Livingston, moreover, a mailgram was received by the Claimant who refused the employment, yet we held that there was nothing in the record to prove that the job was available at any time other than the date on which it was received by Claimant, a considerable time prior to the hearings on which the referee's decision was based.

Summary of this case from King Fifth Wheel v. W.C.A.B
Case details for

Livingston v. W.C.A.B. et al

Case Details

Full title:Vernon E. Livingston, Petitioner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 19, 1982

Citations

447 A.2d 715 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1982)
447 A.2d 715

Citing Cases

Tarr v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

However, September 29, 1980 may or may not be the controlling date: "[u]nless the Employer proves also that…

South Hills Health v. W.C.A.B

In sum, does an employer continue to have the burden to demonstrate an open and available job that the…