From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Livingston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .
Oct 6, 2015
471 S.W.3d 804 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102457

10-06-2015

Roosevelt Livingston, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Mary Highland Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.


Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Mary Highland Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Roosevelt Livingston appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise indicated.
--------


Summaries of

Livingston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .
Oct 6, 2015
471 S.W.3d 804 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Livingston v. State

Case Details

Full title:Roosevelt Livingston, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

471 S.W.3d 804 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)