From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Livingston v. Hainsworth

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2024
Civil Action 22-2306 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-2306

06-24-2024

JEROME LIVINGSTON v. MELISSA HAINSWORTH, Superintendent and THE ATTORNEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA


ORDER

TIMOTHY J'SAWABE, J.

NOW, this 24th day of June, 2024, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), the response to the Petition, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Craig M. Straw (Doc. No. 17), and no objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Craig M. Straw is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and
3. No certificate of appealability shall issue because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).


Summaries of

Livingston v. Hainsworth

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2024
Civil Action 22-2306 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Livingston v. Hainsworth

Case Details

Full title:JEROME LIVINGSTON v. MELISSA HAINSWORTH, Superintendent and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 24, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-2306 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2024)