From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Livingston Hearing Aid Ctr. Inc. v. Insound Med. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. CV11-01965 EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV11-01965 EJD

10-18-2011

LIVINGSTON HEARING AID CENTER, INC. Plaintiff(s), v. INSOUND MEDICAL, INC. Defendant(s).

William J. Goines Attorney for Plaintiff Gerard M. Mooney, Jr. Attorney for Defendant


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[×] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private Mediation Service
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[ ] other requested deadline ______________________________________________

William J. Goines

Attorney for Plaintiff

Gerard M. Mooney, Jr.

Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[ ] Non-binding Arbitration
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[ ] Mediation
[×] Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[ ] other _______________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, William J. Goines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTION ADR PROCESS. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Gerard M. Mooney, Jr., has concurred in this filing.

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

By: William J. Goines


Summaries of

Livingston Hearing Aid Ctr. Inc. v. Insound Med. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. CV11-01965 EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Livingston Hearing Aid Ctr. Inc. v. Insound Med. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LIVINGSTON HEARING AID CENTER, INC. Plaintiff(s), v. INSOUND MEDICAL, INC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV11-01965 EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)