Opinion
CASE NO. CV11-01965 EJD
10-18-2011
William J. Goines Attorney for Plaintiff Gerard M. Mooney, Jr. Attorney for Defendant
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[×] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private Mediation Service
[×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[ ] other requested deadline ______________________________________________
William J. Goines
Attorney for Plaintiff
Gerard M. Mooney, Jr.
Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[ ] Mediation
[×] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[ ] other _______________________
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ATTESTATION CLAUSE
I, William J. Goines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTION ADR PROCESS. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Gerard M. Mooney, Jr., has concurred in this filing.
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
By: William J. Goines