From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liverpool v. Xerox Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 15, 1997
242 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 15, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred as to the defendant Xerox Corporation since the plaintiff's symptoms of repetitive stress injury occurred more than three years prior to the commencement of this action ( see, CPLR 214; Badillo v. International Bus. Machs. Corp., 237 A.D.2d 553; Hayes v. International Bus. Machs. Corp., 237 A.D.2d 254).

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Liverpool v. Xerox Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 15, 1997
242 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Liverpool v. Xerox Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HERMIE V. LIVERPOOL, Appellant, v. XEROX CORPORATION, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 15, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 729