From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lively v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2019
NO. CV 18-2760-TJH (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2019)

Opinion

NO. CV 18-2760-TJH (AGR)

02-26-2019

DAYON DARREN LIVELY, Petitioner, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. DATED: FEBRUARY 26, 2019

/s/_________

TERRY J. HATTER, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lively v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2019
NO. CV 18-2760-TJH (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Lively v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:DAYON DARREN LIVELY, Petitioner, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 26, 2019

Citations

NO. CV 18-2760-TJH (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2019)