From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lively v. Ballard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-07458 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 1, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-07458

09-01-2016

CHARLES JASON LIVELY, Petitioner, v. DAVID BALLARD, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust (the "Motion to Dismiss"). (ECF No. 23.) By Standing Order filed in this case on June 9, 2015, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for total pretrial management and submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition. (ECF No. 2.) On January 13, 2016, the Court entered an order transferring the referral of this case to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (ECF No. 31.) On June 3, 2016, Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn filed proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition (the "PF&R"), in which he recommends that the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 32.)

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Plaintiff's right to appeal this Court's order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Objections to the PF&R in this case were due by June 20, 2016. (See ECF No. 32 at 26-27.) To date, no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the recommendation contained in the PF&R that the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 32 at 26), and DENIES the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 23).

The Court notes that Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn does not terminate the referral of this action in the PF&R, (ECF No. 32), and this Court has not otherwise withdrawn the referral of this case. As such, pursuant to this Court's January 13, 2016 order, this matter remains referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn for total pretrial management and submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition. (See ECF No. 31.) --------

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: September 1, 2016

/s/_________

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lively v. Ballard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-07458 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Lively v. Ballard

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JASON LIVELY, Petitioner, v. DAVID BALLARD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 1, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-07458 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 1, 2016)