From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LiveIntent, Inc. v. Vantage Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 31, 2024
23-CV-11204 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-11204 (VSB)

01-31-2024

LIVEINTENT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE GROUP LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge

On December 27, 2023, Plaintiff LiveIntent, Inc. (“LiveIntent”) commenced this action by filing a Complaint against Defendant Vantage Group LLC (“Vantage”). (Doc. 1 (“Complaint”).) The Court now sua sponte DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice and with leave to replead.

LiveIntent's Complaint predicates federal jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship. (Am. Compl. ¶ 7.) Vantage, however, is a limited liability corporation. (Id. ¶ 11.) Although the Complaint alleges that Vantage is organized under Florida law, it does not plead the citizenship of each of Vantage's constituent members. The Complaint therefore ignores that, for diversity purposes, an LLC is a citizen of every state of which its members are citizens. See Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. Ltd. P 'ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000); Dumann Realty, LLC v. Faust, No. 09-cv-7651, 2013 WL 30672, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2013) (recognizing that an LLC “is completely diverse from opposing parties only if all of the members of the LLC are citizens of different states than all opposing parties”). Accordingly, on its face, the Complaint fails to properly plead the existence of diversity jurisdiction. When a complaint fails to plead subject-matter jurisdiction, courts are obligated to dismiss it sua sponte. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3) (“If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.”); see, e.g., Bodhi Bldg. v. Elmsford Chicken, LLC, No. 21-cv-919, 2021 WL 466009, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2021) (dismissing action for failure to allege citizenship of each member of limited liability company); Laufer Wind Grp. LLC v. DMT Holdings LLC, No. 10-cv-8716, 2010 WL 5174953 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2010) (same).

Accordingly, LiveIntent's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to replead. LiveIntent has thirty days to file an amended complaint that properly asserts subject-matter jurisdiction. If LiveIntent fails to submit an amended complaint within that time frame, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LiveIntent, Inc. v. Vantage Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 31, 2024
23-CV-11204 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

LiveIntent, Inc. v. Vantage Grp.

Case Details

Full title:LIVEINTENT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE GROUP LLC…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

23-CV-11204 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2024)