From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Live Nation v. Ill. Nat'l. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2009
312 F. App'x 898 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-56658.

Submitted February 10, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed February 20, 2009.

David A. Gauntlett, Esquire, James A. Lowe, Esquire, Gauntlett Associates, Irvine, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Stephen M. Hayes, Esquire, Benjamin Larson, Hayes, Davis, Bonino, Ellingson, McLay Scott, LLP Redwood City, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Florence-Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-02721-FMC.

Before: KLEINFELD, BEA and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Live Nation, Inc. appeals the district court's order granting Illinois National Insurance Company's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Live Nation's declaratory judgment action. Live Nation sought a declaration that Illinois National owed it a duty to defend in twenty-two consumer class actions alleging violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. We affirm.

Live Nation's liability policy expressly excludes "antitrust violations" and claims under the Sherman Act. The exception to this exclusion for "unfair competition alleged in conjunction with" a covered wrongful act does not encompass the consumer claims alleged here. See Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Peoples Church of Fresno, 985 F.2d 446, 450 (9th Cir. 1993). The plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claims are based entirely on the alleged antitrust violations.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Live Nation v. Ill. Nat'l. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2009
312 F. App'x 898 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Live Nation v. Ill. Nat'l. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LIVE NATION, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 2009

Citations

312 F. App'x 898 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Mendocino Wine Grp., LLC v. QBE Ams., Inc.

In this order, the Court only discusses the facts as necessary to address the new issues raised in the FAC…

Mendocino Wine Grp., LLC v. QBE Ams., Inc.

However, where the insured does not allege the potential for coverage on the face of an underlying complaint,…