From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liu v. Garland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2022
22 Civ. 10013 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 10013 (AT)

12-01-2022

YONGSHENG LIU, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, MICHAEL VALVERDE, Associate Director of Field Operations Directorate U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parities are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Liu v. Garland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2022
22 Civ. 10013 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Liu v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:YONGSHENG LIU, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 10013 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)