From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Litzman v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 1951
278 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

May 21, 1951.

Present — Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.


In an action, on a policy of insurance, to recover for loss by burglary, the complaint was dismissed on the merits at the close of plaintiff's case on the ground that the assured had breached the contract of insurance by leaving the premises without the protection of a burglary alarm system and by failing to regularly keep books and accounts in such manner that the amount of loss could be accurately determined therefrom by the insurance company; that the defendant had not waived these provisions of the policy; and that the nonwaiver agreement signed by the assured was effective and not waived. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Litzman v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 1951
278 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Litzman v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:BECKY LITZMAN, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 21, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Triple Diamond Café, Inc. v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Any interpretation of the term "fully operational" that would exclude a failure to set an otherwise working…