From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Litvin v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 23, 2011
09 Civ. 8649 (JSR)(HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2011)

Opinion

09 Civ. 8649 (JSR)(HBP)

12-23-2011

ANTHONY LITVIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.


ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.

On October 12, 2011, the Honorable Henry Pitman, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending the denial of the defendant Commissioner's motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings.

Neither party has filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation, and, for that reason alone, they have waived any right to review by this Court. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985); Mario v. P & C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, and, for the reasons therein, denies the motion for judgment on the pleadings and remands the case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with Judge Pitman's opinion. Clerk to close case.

___________

ED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.
Dated: New York, New York

December 23, 2011


Summaries of

Litvin v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 23, 2011
09 Civ. 8649 (JSR)(HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Litvin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LITVIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 23, 2011

Citations

09 Civ. 8649 (JSR)(HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2011)