From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Litton v. Cross

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
May 8, 2012
No.: 3:12-cv-135 (E.D. Tenn. May. 8, 2012)

Opinion

No.: 3:12-cv-135

05-08-2012

JHON ROBBIN LITTON, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF MIKE CROSS, et al., Defendants.


(VARLAN/GUYTON)


MEMORANDUM

On April 9, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to complete and return the service packets for defendants Cross and Barclay within 20 days. Plaintiff was forewarned that failure to return the completed service packets could jeopardize his prosecution of this action. Plaintiff has failed to return the service packets or otherwise respond to the order of this court. Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, sua sponte, for failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of this court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991). The Court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.

AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.

Thomas A. Varlan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Litton v. Cross

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
May 8, 2012
No.: 3:12-cv-135 (E.D. Tenn. May. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Litton v. Cross

Case Details

Full title:JHON ROBBIN LITTON, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF MIKE CROSS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: May 8, 2012

Citations

No.: 3:12-cv-135 (E.D. Tenn. May. 8, 2012)