From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Littleton v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 21, 2024
392 So. 3d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 1D2023-3083

08-21-2024

Zachary Antwann LITTLETON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Zachary Antwann Littleton, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

Zachary Antwann Littleton, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

As the circuit court directed a response to the motion pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Roberts, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Littleton v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 21, 2024
392 So. 3d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Littleton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Zachary Antwann Littleton, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Aug 21, 2024

Citations

392 So. 3d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)