From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Littlejohn v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1836
21 N.C. 343 (N.C. 1836)

Opinion

June Term, 1836.

A plea to a bill of revivor that the cause of action arose more than twenty years before the filling of the original bill, and that after the abatement of the original bill the bill of revivor was not filed within the proper time, and that the same was therefore barred by the statute of limitations, and the length of time between the abatement of the original suit and the filing of the bill of revivor is double, and therefore bad.

AFTER the cause was remanded to the Court of Equity for Rowan, at December Term, 1833 (see 2 Dev. Eq. Rep., 380), it was continued there until October Term, 1835, when the plaintiffs set the plea down for argument. His Honor, Judge Norwood, pro forma, sustained the plea, whereupon the plaintiffs appealed. The plea was that the cause of action arose more than twenty years before the filing of the original bill, and that after the abatement of the original bill, the bill of revivor was not filed within the proper time, and that the same was therefore barred by the statute of limitations and the length of time between the abatement and the original suit and the filing of the bill of revivor.

Nash for plaintiffs.

Pearson for defendants.


The plea in this case is double, and must be overruled. The defense proper for a plea must be such as reduces the case to a particular point which will bar the plaintiff's demand. It is then of use, because, by having the judgment of the court upon that point, the parties are saved the expense of the examination. A plea does not deny the equity, but brings forward a fact or a series of circumstances, forming in their combined result some one fact, which displaces the equity. If there be two defenses offered by a plea, they cannot be separated and one only allowed.

The decree below allowing the plea and dismissing the bill is overruled with costs, and it is ordered that the suit and the proceedings therein do stand revived against Lewis Williams and Joseph Williams, executors of Joseph Williams, the original defendant, and be and stand in the same plight and condition as they were in when the said suit abated. And the cause is remanded to the Court of Equity (344) for the county of Rowan for further proceedings.

PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Littlejohn v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1836
21 N.C. 343 (N.C. 1836)
Case details for

Littlejohn v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS B. LITTLEJOHN ET AL. v. LEWIS WILLIAMS ET AL., EXECUTORS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1836

Citations

21 N.C. 343 (N.C. 1836)

Citing Cases

Littlejohn v. Williams

PER CURIAM. Remanded. Cited: S. c., 21 N.C. 343; Ray v. Ray, 41 N.C. 356.…