From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Littlejohn v. Leffingwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1899
42 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)

Opinion

July Term, 1899.


While we think that the plaintiff is entitled to an inspection, the order made at Special Term is broader than is warranted by the averments of the petition. The only books and papers which the petition shows it is necessary for the plaintiff to inspect to enable her to prepare for trial are those specified in the 5th subdivision, which were kept by De Witt C. Littlejohn, as executor. The order should be modified so as to limit the inspection to such books and papers, and, as thus modified, should be affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. The defense, though affirmative in form, is in reality simply a denial of the plaintiff's alleged cause of action, and the defendants should not be required to serve a bill of particulars thereof. Order for bill of particulars reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. All concurred.


Summaries of

Littlejohn v. Leffingwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1899
42 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)
Case details for

Littlejohn v. Leffingwell

Case Details

Full title:Margaret E. Littlejohn, Respondent, v. Lucy A.L. Leffingwell…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1899

Citations

42 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)
59 N.Y.S. 1108