From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 8, 1983
440 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-2112.

November 8, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, George Orr, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rory S. Stein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and William P. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


Willie Lee Little was convicted of burglary of a structure and grand theft in 1982. The evidence showed that he had been convicted of numerous other burglaries. He was sentenced as a habitual offender.

Appellant seeks reversal of his sentences on the ground that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a habitual offender pursuant to section 775.084(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), since the court failed to specify the basis for sentencing him as a habitual offender and failed to find that the enhanced sentences were necessary for the protection of the public. We find merit in appellant's contention and reverse appellant's sentences as a habitual offender and remand for the trial court to make the specific finding required by section 775.084(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1981), that such sentencing is necessary for the protection of the public from further criminal activity by the appellant or, if the record fails to support such a finding, to vacate the habitual offender sentences. Brown v. State, 435 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (on rehearing); Cavallaro v. State, 420 So.2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Sentence reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Little v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 8, 1983
440 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Little v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE LEE LITTLE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 8, 1983

Citations

440 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Watson v. State

As to appellant's second contention, it has been repeatedly held that section 775.084(3)(d) requires specific…

Roberts v. State

We remand for the trial court to either make the requisite findings or, if the record does not support such…