Thus, it was not preserved.See Curry v. State, 910 S.W.2d 490, 497 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (en banc) (concluding that appellant failed to preserve argument that sentence was cruel and unusual by failing to object at trial); Little v. State, No. 07-12-00042-CR, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3763, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 11, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding that appellant waived his complaint about his sentence being excessive when he did not raise it with the trial court). Because appellant has forfeited her complaint, we overrule the issue.
Thus, her complaint was waived. See Little v. State, No. 07-12-00042-CR, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3763, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 11, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding that appellant waived his complaint about his sentence being excessive when he did not raise it with the trial court). Third, upon revoking probation, a trial judge has the discretion to levy the original sentence assessed before placing the appellant on probation.