From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 140 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81662

March 18, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; James Hartenbach, Judge.

Gwenda Renee' Robinson, St. Louis, MO,

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon,Attorney General, Andrea Mazza Follett, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J.



ORDER


Movant, Scott L. Little, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he involuntarily pleaded guilty because his plea counsel told him he would receive the maximum sentence available if he proceeded to trial.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Little v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 140 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Little v. State

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT L. LITTLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 18, 2003

Citations

100 S.W.3d 140 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)