From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little v. Smeal

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 19, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1257 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 19, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1257.

November 19, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Elizabeth T. Hey, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

The Court notes that Petitioner has failed to file any objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation.

1. the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;
3. there exists no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right requiring the issuance of a certificate of appealability; and
4. the Clerk of Court shall close this matter for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Little v. Smeal

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 19, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1257 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Little v. Smeal

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN LITTLE v. PAUL SMEAL, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1257 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Beasley

Here, the statute of limitations would render any Miller notice meaningless, as it would any certificate of…

United States v. Beasley

Here, the statute of limitations would render any Miller notice meaningless, as it would any certificate of…