Opinion
696 CAF 18-01399
08-22-2019
IN THE MATTER OF MONICA LITTLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. SCOTT LITTLE, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. VICTORIA L. KING, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. VICTORIA L. KING, CANANDAIGUA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, APPELLANT PRO SE. KAMAN, BERLOVE, MARAFIOTI, JACOBSTEIN & GOLDMAN, LLP, ROCHESTER (GARY MULDOON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT:
CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
VICTORIA L. KING, CANANDAIGUA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, APPELLANT PRO SE.
KAMAN, BERLOVE, MARAFIOTI, JACOBSTEIN & GOLDMAN, LLP, ROCHESTER (GARY MULDOON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Frederick G. Reed, A.J.), entered May 31, 2018 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted the motion of respondent-petitioner insofar as it sought to vacate an order to show cause filed by petitioner-respondent to modify the parties' custody agreement.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Little v Little ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Aug. 22, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: August 22, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court