The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (seeMatter of Cunningham v. Annucci, 168 A.D.3d 1340, 1340, 90 N.Y.S.3d 915 [2019] ; Matter of Little v. Lee, 164 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 81 N.Y.S.3d 770 [2018] ). Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Boeck v. Annucci, 165 A.D.3d 1334, 1334, 82 N.Y.S.3d 748 [2018] ; Matter of Little v. Lee, 164 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 81 N.Y.S.3d 770 [2018] ). Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $ 5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Little v. Lee, 164 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 81 N.Y.S.3d 770 [2018] ; Matter of Liggan v. Rodriguez, 163 A.D.3d 1386, 1386–1387, 77 N.Y.S.3d 910 [2018] ). Garry, P.J., Clark, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.
The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determinations have been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharges have been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (seeMatter of Boeck v. Annucci, 165 A.D.3d 1334, 1334, 82 N.Y.S.3d 748 [2018] ; Matter of Little v. Lee, 164 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 81 N.Y.S.3d 770 [2018] ).ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
We note that the loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the disciplinary proceeding should be restored (see Matter of Hogan v Annucci, 162 AD3d 1418, 1418 [2018], appeal dismissed 32 NY3d 1001 [2018]). Inasmuch as petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Boeck v Annucci, 165 AD3d 1334, 1334 [2018]; Matter of Little v Lee, 164 AD3d 1559, 1560 [2018]). Whether the time that petitioner spent in keeplock as a result of the instant disciplinary determination was properly credited toward his confinement in connection with other unrelated disciplinary matters is not properly before us in this proceeding (see 7 NYCRR part 5; Matter of Barclay v Summers, 60 AD3d 1181, 1181 [2009]).
The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. We note that the loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the disciplinary proceeding should be restored (see Matter of Hogan v. Annucci, 162 A.D.3d 1418, 1418, 75 N.Y.S.3d 922 [2018], appeal dismissed 32 N.Y.3d 1001, 86 N.Y.S.3d 759, 111 N.E.3d 1115 [2018] ). Inasmuch as petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Boeck v. Annucci, 165 A.D.3d 1334, 1334, 82 N.Y.S.3d 748 [2018] ; Matter of Little v. Lee, 164 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 81 N.Y.S.3d 770 [2018] ). Whether the time that petitioner spent in keeplock as a result of the instant disciplinary determination was properly credited toward his confinement in connection with other unrelated disciplinary matters is not properly before us in this proceeding (see 7 NYCRR part 5; Matter of Barclay v. Summers, 60 A.D.3d 1181, 1181, 873 N.Y.S.2d 921 [2009] ). Garry, P.J., Devine, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.