From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Litmon v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
C 10-03894 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

C 10-03894 EMC

10-24-2011

DAVID LITMON, JR., Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor of California; and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, Defendants.


KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
TAMAR PACHTER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
DANIEL J. POWELL
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT


ORDER


RECITALS

1. On September 12, 2011, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Strike and Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. In its Order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty days of its Order.

2. On October 11, 2011, Plaintiff timely filed a Second Amended Complaint. Under Rule 15(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants have fourteen days to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Currently, defendants' response is due October 25, 2011.

3. The parties have agreed to provide defendants fourteen additional days in which to respond to the Second Amended Complaint, through and including November 8, 2011.

4. No other extensions of time have been requested in this case.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff in pro se, and defendants by and through their counsel hereby stipulate:

1. Defendants shall have until November 8, 2011 to respond to the Second Amended Complaint.

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

TAMAR PACHTER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIEL J. POWELL

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

DAVID LITMON

Plaintiff in pro se
I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Plaintiff in pro se David Litmon. By: Daniel J. Powell
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Judge Edward M. Chen

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL AND U.S. MAIL

Case Name: David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala D. Harris, et al. No.: C 10-03894 EMC I declare:

I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member's direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service with postage thereon fully prepaid that same day in the ordinary course of business.

On October 24, 2011, I served the attached STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102-7004, addressed as follows: David Litmon, Jr.
32314 Ruth Court
Union City, CA 94587
Email: litmonjr@yahoo.com

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 24, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

Susan Chiang

Declarant

Susan Chiang

Signature


Summaries of

Litmon v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
C 10-03894 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Litmon v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LITMON, JR., Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

C 10-03894 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)