From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Litherland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 10, 2019
590 S.W.3d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107486

12-10-2019

Nanette S. LITHERLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Jessica Hathaway, Rosenblum, Schwartz & Fry, PC, 120 S. Central, Suite 130 St., Louis, MO 63105, for appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Jessica Hathaway, Rosenblum, Schwartz & Fry, PC, 120 S. Central, Suite 130 St., Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nanette S. Litherland appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Litherland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 10, 2019
590 S.W.3d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Litherland v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nanette S. LITHERLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Dec 10, 2019

Citations

590 S.W.3d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)