From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lister v. Jones

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jul 10, 2009
Case No. CIV-07-732-M (W.D. Okla. Jul. 10, 2009)

Summary

rejecting identical claim where petitioner "offer[ed] nothing more than speculation" to support his argument

Summary of this case from Smith v. Mirandy

Opinion

Case No. CIV-07-732-M.

July 10, 2009


ORDER


On June 19, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by July 9, 2009. On July 7, 2009, petitioner filed his objection, objecting to the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Having carefully reviewed the matter de novo, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on June 19, 2009;
(2) DENIES the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and
(3) ORDERS that judgment in favor of respondent issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lister v. Jones

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jul 10, 2009
Case No. CIV-07-732-M (W.D. Okla. Jul. 10, 2009)

rejecting identical claim where petitioner "offer[ed] nothing more than speculation" to support his argument

Summary of this case from Smith v. Mirandy
Case details for

Lister v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE D. LISTER, Petitioner, v. JUSTIN JONES, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 10, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-07-732-M (W.D. Okla. Jul. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Mirandy

However, the Court notes that To the extent that Petitioner might argue that he was prejudiced because the…

McCloud v. United States

This assertion is mere speculation and is not supported by any facts tending to show prejudice. Cf. Lister v.…