Lister v. Bank of Lucedale

1 Citing case

  1. Sipe v. Farmer

    398 So. 2d 1325 (Miss. 1981)   Cited 5 times

    This Court said that the counterclaim had "no causal or factual relation to the promissory note" and affirmed the trial court's action in sustaining the motion to strike the counterclaim. A similar situation was presented in Lister v. Bank of Lucedale, 349 So.2d 1056 (Miss. 1977). In Lister, the plaintiff filed suit for the balance due on a promissory note.