From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lissner v. Dochtermann

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1906
49 Misc. 624 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

January, 1906.

Maurice H. Gotlieb, for respondent.

George Freifeld and S.C. Steinhardt, for appellants.


This is an appeal by the defendants from an order amending the judgment in favor of the defendants by striking therefrom the allowance of thirty dollars for costs and disbursements.

The motion for the order appealed from was made more than five days after the judgment was rendered and according to section 254 of the Municipal Court Act was too late. Buchbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. 85.

SCOTT and DOWLING, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant.


Summaries of

Lissner v. Dochtermann

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1906
49 Misc. 624 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

Lissner v. Dochtermann

Case Details

Full title:HENRY LISSNER, Respondent, v . CHARLES DOCHTERMANN et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1906

Citations

49 Misc. 624 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
97 N.Y.S. 230