From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lisner v. Toplitz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1904
69 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1904)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 1904

Decided January 19, 1904

Charles Blandy, Charles T.B. Rowe and Frederick A. Card for appellant.

C.A. Brodek and Herbert A. Heyn for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Dissenting: PARKER, Ch. J. Absent: O'BRIEN, J.


Summaries of

Lisner v. Toplitz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1904
69 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1904)
Case details for

Lisner v. Toplitz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID LISNER, Respondent, v . SAMSON L. TOPLITZ…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 19, 1904

Citations

69 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1904)
69 N.E. 1125

Citing Cases

Dubuc v. Lazell, Dalley Co.

erent question would be presented, upon which it is unnecessary at this time to express an opinion. If, as…