From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lismore v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 13, 1928
95 Fla. 142 (Fla. 1928)

Opinion

Decision Filed February 13, 1928.

A Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Record for Orange County; W. L. Tilden, Judge.

H. B. S. Hammond, for Plaintiff in Error;

Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy S. Campbell, Assistant, for the State.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Lismore v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 13, 1928
95 Fla. 142 (Fla. 1928)
Case details for

Lismore v. State of Florida

Case Details

Full title:A. LISMORE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Feb 13, 1928

Citations

95 Fla. 142 (Fla. 1928)
115 So. 840

Citing Cases

State v. Panchuk

(Emphasis is ours). To the same effect, see State v. Lismore, 94 Ark. 213, 29 L.R.A.(N.S.) 721, 126 S.W. 855.…

Caton Headley v. State

State v. Nichols, 38 Ark. 550, Actually, acquittal or conviction of either would bar prosecution for the…