Opinion
Civil Case No. 10-cv-02206-REB-BNB
09-16-2011
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Blackburn, J.
This matter is before me on the following: (1) the plaintiff's Motion for TRO and/or Preliminary Injunction pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P, 65 [#9] filed October 4, 2010; (2) defendants Creany and Walsh's Motion To Dismiss [#37] filed February 16, 2011; (3) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#63] filed July 28, 2011; and (4) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#64] filed July 28, 2011. No party has filed objections to the recommendations. I approve and adopt the recommendations, deny the plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order, and grant the motion to dismiss of defendants Creany and Walsh.
"[#9]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Because the plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his pleadings and other filings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991).
Because no party filed objections to the recommendations, I review the recommendations only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no error, much less plain error, in the magistrate judge's recommended dispositions, I approve and adopt the recommendations, deny the motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and grant the motion to dismiss.
This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.
--------
The plaintiff's complaint concerns medical treatment he received for an injury he suffered while incarcerated in the Colorado Department of Corrections. Addressing the motion for temporary restraining order [#9] and the motion to dismiss [#37], the magistrate judge details correctly the applicable legal standards and applies those standards correctly to the plaintiff's allegations. Based on this analysis, the magistrate judge's recommendations that the motion for temporary restraining order [#9] be denied and the motion to dismiss [#37] be granted are correct.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#63] filed July 28, 2011, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court;
2. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#64] filed July 28, 2011, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court;
3. That the plaintiff's Motion for TRO and/or Preliminary Injunction pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P, 65 [#9] filed October 4, 2010, is DENIED;
4. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6), the Motion To Dismiss [#37] filed February 16, 2011, by defendants, Dr. Tim Creany, M.D., and Michael S. Walsh, is GRANTED;
5. That all of the plaintiff's claims against defendants, Dr. Tim Creany, M.D., and Michael S. Walsh, are DISMISSED with prejudice;
6. That defendants, Dr. Tim Creany, M.D., and Michael S. Walsh, are DROPPED from this action, and the caption of this case shall be AMENDED accordingly.
Dated September 16, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Robert E. Blackburn
United States District Judge