Opinion
Submitted April 21, 1999
June 7, 1999
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated June 16, 1998, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).
Charles DeStefano, Staten Island, N.Y., for appellant.
Montfort, Healy, McGuire Salley, Garden City, N.Y. (Edward R. Rimmels of counsel), for respondents.
SONDRA MILLER, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment in the instant case. The defendants established a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the underlying accident ( see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955), thereby shifting the burden to the plaintiff to come forward with sufficient evidence that she sustained a serious injury ( see, Licari v. Elliot, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 235; Lopez v. Senatore, 65 N.Y.2d 1017).
With respect to the plaintiffs alleged back injuries, the affirmed report of her treating physician was insufficient to defeat the defendants' motion, as it was based upon an examination conducted more than three years prior to the defendants' summary judgment motion ( see, Schultz v. Von Voight, 216 A.D.2d 451, affd 86 N.Y.2d 865; Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774; Philpotts v. Petrovic, 160 A.D.2d 856, 857). Additionally, the plaintiff's physician failed to indicate what, if any, objective tests he had performed in reaching his conclusion ( see, Lincoln v. Johnson, 225 A.D.2d 593; Giannakis v. Paschilidou, 212 A.D.2d 502; Antoniou v. Duff, 204 A.D.2d 670).
Furthermore, the plaintiff presented no evidence that she had suffered a "significant disfigurement" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) ( see, Loiseau v. Maxwell, 256 A.D.2d 450 [2d Dept., Dec. 16, 1998]; Koppelman v. Lepler, 135 A.D.2d 507).