From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liriano v. Eveready Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 3, 2012
94 A.D.3d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-3

Ramon LIRIANO, respondent, v. EVEREADY INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant.

Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. (Marshall D. Sweetbaum of counsel), for appellant. Linda T. Ziatz, P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y., for respondent.


Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. (Marshall D. Sweetbaum of counsel), for appellant. Linda T. Ziatz, P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420(a)(2) to recover the amount of an unsatisfied judgment against the defendant's insured, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), dated November 4, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff would be unable to prove at trial that service of the judgment was made upon the defendant.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that summary judgment should be denied because the affidavit of service prepared by the plaintiff's now-deceased process server may be admitted as prima facie evidence of service in proceedings before that court ( see CPLR 4531; Koyenov v. Twin–D Transp., Inc., 33 A.D.3d 967, 969, 824 N.Y.S.2d 338). The defendant may then present testimony in rebuttal, with issues of credibility to be determined by the Supreme Court ( see e.g. Capital Resources Corp. v. Auguste, 266 A.D.2d 330, 698 N.Y.S.2d 303; Deitsch v. Fischer, 246 A.D.2d 623, 667 N.Y.S.2d 314; Gordon v. Nemeroff Realty Corp., 139 A.D.2d 492, 492–493, 526 N.Y.S.2d 595). The decision and order of this Court in a prior appeal in this case does not support a contrary conclusion ( see Liriano v. Eveready Ins. Co., 65 A.D.3d 524, 884 N.Y.S.2d 248).

The defendant's remaining contention was improperly advanced for the first time in its reply papers before the Supreme Court, and therefore we do not consider it ( see Goldman v. A & E Club Props., LLC, 89 A.D.3d 681, 683, 932 N.Y.S.2d 136; Djoganopoulos v. Polkes, 67 A.D.3d 726, 727, 889 N.Y.S.2d 213).

MASTRO, A.P.J., HALL, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Liriano v. Eveready Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 3, 2012
94 A.D.3d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Liriano v. Eveready Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Ramon LIRIANO, respondent, v. EVEREADY INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

94 A.D.3d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
941 N.Y.S.2d 509
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2466

Citing Cases

Mora v. Cammeby's Realty Corp.

The defendant's contentions with respect to Multiple Dwelling Law §§ 77(4) and 78(1), and pre–1968 versions…

Lucas & Son Real Holdings, LLC v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Here, defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing…