From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liquid Resources of Ohio v. Lexxus Environmental, Ltd.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 21, 2010
Case No. 1:06cv1204 (N.D. Ohio May. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06cv1204.

May 21, 2010


ORDER


On March 12, 2010, Defendant/Counter-Claimant Lexxus Environmental, Ltd. ("Lexxus") filed a Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #63). The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Nancy A. Vecchiarelli pursuant to Local Rule 72.2 to hold a damages hearing on a default judgment previously entered by the District Judge in favor of Defendant/Counter-Claimant Lexxus Environmental, Ltd. ("Lexxus"). (Docs. # 64 and #65). The Magistrate Judge held a hearing on April 14, 2010, at which Lexxus informed the Court that it was seeking damages for lost profits and lost business opportunities, attorney fees, and prejudgment interest based upon plaintiff's breach of contract. Defendant further informed the Court that it did not wish to pursue its Third Party Complaint against Veolia ES Technical Solutions LLC, which was filed on June 3, 2009, but never served. (Doc. #58).

On April 23, 2010, the Magistrate Judge recommended that (1) Lexxus be awarded $926,750.00 in damages and $43,390.00 in attorneys' fees and expenses against Liquid Resources of Ohio plus interest at the statutory rate; (2) Lexxus's claim for prejudgment interest be denied; and (3) Lexxus's Third Party Complaint against Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC (Doc. # 58) be dismissed without prejudice for failure of service. (Dkt. # 73).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen (14) days after service, but both parties have failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that both parties are satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Therefore, Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and (1) Lexxus is awarded $926,750.00 in damages and $43,390.00 in attorneys' fees and expenses against Liquid Resources of Ohio plus interest at the statutory rate; (2) Lexxus's claim for prejudgment interest is denied; and (3) Lexxus's Third Party Complaint against Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC (Doc. # 58) is dismissed without prejudice for failure of service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Liquid Resources of Ohio v. Lexxus Environmental, Ltd.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 21, 2010
Case No. 1:06cv1204 (N.D. Ohio May. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Liquid Resources of Ohio v. Lexxus Environmental, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:Liquid Resources of Ohio, Plaintiff, v. Lexxus Environmental, Ltd.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: May 21, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:06cv1204 (N.D. Ohio May. 21, 2010)