From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liptak v. Mattingly

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 31, 2011
No. 05-11-00192-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-11-00192-CV

Opinion issued August 31, 2011.

On Appeal from the 255th District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-18622-S.

Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices O'NEILL and LANG-MIERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


By letter dated February 22, 2011, the Court notified appellant that the $175 filing fee was due and required appellant to pay the fee within ten days. The Court warned appellant that failure to pay the fee will result in dismissal of the case without further notice.

By letter dated April 14, 2011, the Court notified appellant that he had not paid or made arrangements to pay the district clerk's fee for the clerk's record. The Court required appellant to provide within ten days written verification that appellant had paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk's fee or written documentation that appellant has been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We warned appellant that the failure to provide the required documentation within the specified time may result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. As of the date of this order, this Court's filing fee has not been paid, and the required documentation concerning payment for the district clerk's fee for the clerk's record has not been provided. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c).


Summaries of

Liptak v. Mattingly

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 31, 2011
No. 05-11-00192-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Liptak v. Mattingly

Case Details

Full title:VIRGIL LIPTAK, Appellant v. JUNE MATTINGLY, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

Citations

No. 05-11-00192-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)