From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liptak v. Mattingly

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 7, 2011
No. 05-09-00872-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-09-00872-CV

Opinion Filed June 7, 2011.

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 07-12454.

Before Justices RICHTER, LANG, and FILLMORE.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


By letter dated April 20, 2011, we informed appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days would result in dismissal of the appeal. By letter dated May 3, 2011, we notified appellant that our records show he checked out the clerk's record on May 14, 2010 and had failed to return the record. We cautioned appellant that failure to return the clerk's record within ten days could result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, appellant has not returned the clerk's record, filed a brief or an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court.

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).


Summaries of

Liptak v. Mattingly

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 7, 2011
No. 05-09-00872-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Liptak v. Mattingly

Case Details

Full title:VIRGIL LIPTAK, Appellant v. JUNE MATTINGLY, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jun 7, 2011

Citations

No. 05-09-00872-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2011)