From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lipsky v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 24, 2012
No. 576 EAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 576 EAL 2011

04-24-2012

MARTIN LIPSKY AND DANIEL LIPSKY AND ELIE LIPSKY, Respondents v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioner, are:

a. Whether a claim for emotional distress without physical injury is covered by a liability insurance policy which provides coverage for "bodily injury" defined as "bodily injury to a person and sickness, disease or death which results from it."
b. Assuming, arguendo, that such claims do constitute bodily injury, whether plaintiffs' claims for emotional distress are subject to the "each accident" liability limits of the State Farm insurance policy, rather than the "each person" liability limits, despite the fact that plaintiffs' emotional distress resulted from the bodily injury suffered by Benjamin Lipsky, and the policy includes within its "each person" limits "all injury and damages to others resulting from this bodily injury."
c.


Summaries of

Lipsky v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 24, 2012
No. 576 EAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Lipsky v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN LIPSKY AND DANIEL LIPSKY AND ELIE LIPSKY, Respondents v. STATE FARM…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

No. 576 EAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 24, 2012)