From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lips v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Arapahoe Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01103-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Jun. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01103-WYD-MJW Civil Action No. 12-cv-01107-WYD-BNB

06-29-2012

VIRGILIUS LIPS and LYNDA LIPS, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY; ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF GRAYSON ROBINSON, In his official capacity; AGENT MATT HANAGAN, in his individual and official capacities; INVESTIGATOR CRAIG TANGEMAN, in his individual and official capacities; OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, in his individual and official capacities; OFFICER JOHN DOE #3, in his individual and official capacities; OFFICER JOHN DOE #4, in his individual and official capacities; and OFFICER JOHN DOE #5, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants. MELVEN LIPS and JULIEN LIPS, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY; ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF GRAYSON ROBINSON, in his official capacity; AGENT MATT HANAGAN, in his individual and official capacities; INVESTIGATOR CRAIG TANGEMAN, in his individual and official capacities; OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, in his individual and official capacities; and OFFICER JOHN DOE #2, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants.


Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel


ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a review of the files. On June 14, 2012, I issued an Order to Show Cause in both of the above-referenced cases asking the parties to show cause why the cases should not be consolidated. The parties have filed responses indicating that consolidation is appropriate. I agree for the reasons stated below.

Fed. R. Civ. P.42(a) provides that "[w]hen actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the action; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay." Consolidation is within the discretion of the trial court. Gillette Motor Transport v. Northern Oklahoma Butane Co., 179 F.2d 711, 712 (10th Cir. 1950). I find that the two cases at issue involve common questions of law and fact involving the alleged use of excessive force and other alleged violations of law when the Lips' residence was searched on April 29, 2010. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the two-above referenced cases are consolidated for all further purposes. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this Order in both cases. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all pleadings and other filings shall hereafter be filed in the lower numbered case only, Civil Action No. 11-cv-01103-WYD-MJW, using the caption appearing in this Order. Finally, it is

ORDERED that Civil Action No. 11-cv-01107 shall hereafter be referred to the magistrate judge assigned to the lowest case, in this case Magistrate Judge Watanabe.

BY THE COURT:

____________

Wiley Y. Daniel

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lips v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Arapahoe Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01103-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Jun. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Lips v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Arapahoe Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:VIRGILIUS LIPS and LYNDA LIPS, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01103-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Jun. 29, 2012)