From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liotti v. Nassau County

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 24, 2006
00-CV-225 (JS)(JO) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2006)

Opinion

00-CV-225 (JS)(JO).

January 24, 2006

Thomas F. Liotti, Esq., Pro se., Law Offices of Thomas F. Liotti, Garden City, NY, For Plaintiffs.

Liora M. Ben-Sorek, Esq., Nassau County Attorney's Office, Mineola, NY, For Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James Orenstein issued November 28, 2005, to which no party has objected, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and ORDERS that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Report and Recommendation provided that any objections were to be filed with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of service. The Eastern District of New York's Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") system indicates that all Parties in this action were served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation on or about November 28, 2005. The Court notes that the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been filed. Accordingly, all objections are hereby deemed to have been waived.

The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and ORDERS that the Amended Complaint in this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Liotti v. Nassau County

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 24, 2006
00-CV-225 (JS)(JO) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Liotti v. Nassau County

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. LIOTTI, Plaintiff, v. NASSAU COUNTY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jan 24, 2006

Citations

00-CV-225 (JS)(JO) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2006)