From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linville v. Matteson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:22-cv-0057 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0057 KJM AC P

06-24-2022

MARTIN LINVILLE, Petitioner, v. GISELLE MATTESON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 7. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 2, 2022, the court issued an order recommending that this matter be dismissed for failure to obey court orders and for failure either to file an in forma pauperis application or to pay the filing fee. ECF No. 8. Since then, petitioner has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 9. Petitioner has also paid the filing fee.

Because petitioner has complied with the court's previously issued orders, the pending findings and recommendations are no longer applicable, and petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is moot. Therefore, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as such, and the outstanding findings and recommendations order will be vacated.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 9) is DENIED as moot, and

2. The pending findings and recommendations order issued May 2, 2022 (ECF No. 8), is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Linville v. Matteson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:22-cv-0057 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Linville v. Matteson

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN LINVILLE, Petitioner, v. GISELLE MATTESON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0057 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)