From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linthecome v. Junious

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00923-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00923-AWI-BAM PC

07-24-2012

MARCUS LEON LINTHECOME, Plaintiff, v. MAURICE JUNIOUS, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM


OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-DAYS

Plaintiff Marcus Leon Linthecome is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2012, Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). On June 5, 2012, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. An order issued on June 8, 2012, striking the first amended complaint for failing to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims. More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action BE DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty (20) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Linthecome v. Junious

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00923-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Linthecome v. Junious

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS LEON LINTHECOME, Plaintiff, v. MAURICE JUNIOUS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00923-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)