From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linsford D. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Leilani D.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 12, 2021
190 A.D.3d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

12819 Dkt. No. NN-08327/17 Case No. 2019-03532

01-12-2021

In the MATTER OF LEILANI D., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Linsford D., Respondent-Appellant, v. Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.

Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant. James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julia Bedell of counsel), for respondent. Janet Neustaetter, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Chai Park of counsel), attorney for the child.


Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julia Bedell of counsel), for respondent.

Janet Neustaetter, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Chai Park of counsel), attorney for the child.

Renwick, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, New York County (Patria Frias–Colon, J.), entered on or about August 5, 2019, which, inter alia, after a hearing, determined that respondent father neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence that the father compelled the child to lie about alleged abuse sustained while in the mother's care to please him, or otherwise risk his anger or have him withhold treats and, on multiple occasions, subjected the child to multiple medical examinations and forensic interviews based on such unfounded allegations of abuse (see Matter of Ruth Joanna O.O. [Melissa O.] , 49 N.Y.S.3d 374, 149 A.D.3d 32, 40–41 [1st Dept. 2017], affd 30 N.Y.3d 985, 65 N.Y.S.3d 122, 87 N.E.3d 154 [2017] ; see also e.g. Matter of Tyler W.[Janice B.] , 52 N.Y.S.3d 405, 149 A.D.3d 968, 969 [2d Dept 2017] ). The father's conduct caused the child serious emotional harm and he thus failed to meet the minimum standard of care that is required of a reasonable and prudent parent.


Summaries of

Linsford D. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Leilani D.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 12, 2021
190 A.D.3d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Linsford D. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Leilani D.)

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF LEILANI D., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 12, 2021

Citations

190 A.D.3d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
190 A.D.3d 478

Citing Cases

Tiffany S. v. Admin. for Child. Serv. (In re C.B.)

Petitioner agency’s caseworker testified that the mother appeared to be erratic and having auditory…

Isabela P. v. Jacob P.

The evidence further supported the court's determination that the father knew the allegations to be false…