From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linn v. U Chain

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Sep 20, 2023
Civil Action 22-cv-6258 (W.D. La. Sep. 20, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-cv-6258

09-20-2023

MONTREAL LINN v. U CHAIN


PEREZ-MONTES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

JUDGMENT

TERRY A. DOUGHTY JUDGE.

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 37] previously filed herein, having thoroughly reviewed the record, noting the lack of objection, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that because Plaintiff Montreal Linn's (“Linn”) Complaint [Doc. No.1] is untimely filed, and Linn fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted, the Motions to Dismiss [Doc. Nos. 23, 34] filed by Defendants Universal Chain of Texas, LLC, Michael Croker, Joey Curry, and Mike Peterson are hereby GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Linn's Complaint and Amended Complaints [Doc. Nos. 12, 17, and 33] are DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED.


Summaries of

Linn v. U Chain

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Sep 20, 2023
Civil Action 22-cv-6258 (W.D. La. Sep. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Linn v. U Chain

Case Details

Full title:MONTREAL LINN v. U CHAIN

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 20, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 22-cv-6258 (W.D. La. Sep. 20, 2023)