From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Line v. Titan Int'l Logistics, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 29, 2011
Case No. CV 10-6165 R (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 10-6165 R (JEMx)

08-29-2011

MAERSK LINE, Plaintiff, v. TITAN INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS, LLC Defendant.

Stephen M. Uthoff, State Bar No. 145206 Uthoff Law Corporation 401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710 Long Beach, California 90802 Attorneys for Plaintiff MAERSK LINE


Stephen M. Uthoff, State Bar No. 145206

Uthoff Law Corporation

401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710

Long Beach, California 90802

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAERSK LINE

IN ADMIRALTY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment filed herein:

IT IS ADJUDGED that Maersk Line recover from Titan International Logistics, LLC the sum of $129,190.45 and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).

Hon. Manuel L. Real

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710, Long Beach, California 90802.

On August 25, 2011, I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

on the interested parties as follows:

Joseph A. Maleki

Maleki & Associates

1100 Quail Street, Suite 100

Newport Beach, CA 92660

[x ] BY MAIL: I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Long Beach, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Long Beach, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

[] VIA CM/ECF: Pursuant to General Order 10-7 the forgoing document was served on counsel via the Court's CM/ECF system.

[X] Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made.

Executed on August 25, 2011, at Long Beach, California.

Stephen M. Uthoff


Summaries of

Line v. Titan Int'l Logistics, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 29, 2011
Case No. CV 10-6165 R (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Line v. Titan Int'l Logistics, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MAERSK LINE, Plaintiff, v. TITAN INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS, LLC Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 10-6165 R (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)