Lindstrom v. Hunt Enterprises, Inc.

Full title: CARL LINDSTROM et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HUNT ENTERPRISES…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Second District, Third Division

Date published: Dec 21, 2007

No. B189275 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2007)

Opinion

CARL LINDSTROM et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HUNT ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. B189275 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Third Division December 21, 2007

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC319279

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

The opinion filed in the above-entitled matter on November 21, 2007, is modified as follows:

On page 26, after the first paragraph ending on line 13, add a new paragraph reading:

Apart from Estate of Anderson, supra, 60 Cal.App.4th 436, the defendants have not shown that California law recognizes any form of “quasi estoppel” applicable to the facts present here.

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing filed by Hunt Enterprises, Inc., and Donald Hunt is denied.